Micron Document
Gemini Proxy


gemini.techrights.org gemini.techrights.org/2019/07/13/linux-control-over-users/
● 07.13.19

●● Linux is Doing ‘Well’ Only for Those Who Dislike Software Freedom and Love Control Over Users

Posted in Deception, DRM, GNU/Linux, IBM, Kernel, Microsoft, Red Hat at 9:58 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Recent: Azure Running GNU/Linux Isn’t About ‘Love’ But About Control


Summary: Linux, the kernel, has become a corporate playground or a sandbox that’s used to upsell proprietary software, including surveillance; freedom in Linux is gradually being diminished if not completely obliterated and it does not worry the foundations entrusted to guard against it

THE urgent need to return to old
topics (hence this reader

http://techrights.org/wiki/index.php/Open_Source_Initiative

All of these things very much
matter to Software Freedom (perhaps

http://techrights.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Foundation

We often feel guilty for, having
covered European matters so closely

https://twitter.com/zoobab/status/1149257125169946624

Speaking personally, I’ve become more sympathetic towards Torvalds after what they did to him last year, indirectly removing (or shaming) him from his own project, even if just temporarily. It reminded me of what happened in Docker after Microsoft had gotten involved (Docker is nowadays in Microsoft’s pockets and the founder, who originally came from Red Hat, was pretty much ousted).


Looking at the latest from the
Linux Foundation and Linux.com, I

https://web.archive.org/web/*/linux.com
https://web.archive.org/web/20020721082135/http://linux.com/
https://web.archive.org/web/20050531230150/http://www.linux.com/
https://web.archive.org/web/20080115053415/http://www.linux.com/
http://techrights.org/wiki/index.php/Jim_Zemlin

“Looking at the latest from the Linux Foundation and Linux.com, I am rather frustrated.”Well, if the Foundation is trying to revive Linux.com with just one writer doing about 2 paragraphs a day, including Microsoft promotion, then it’s using a site called “LINUX” (.com) to promote “Microsoft” and other Linux-hostile interests. Just before the weekend they advertised Microsoft, rendering it not too hard to see what these sellouts really are…

https://www.linux.com/content/dont-miss-update
https://www.linux.com/news/microsofts-quantum-development-kit-goes-open-source-github-0

Some time on Friday they published: “Get a digest of original Linux and open source news and tutorials from Linux.com delivered to your inbox weekly.”

So there is at least some intent or a plan to make something of the site. On Friday morning Google News search results for “Linux” included several items from Linux.com, but 50% of the results were actually about Microsoft (promotion of Microsoft and Azure) and a quarter came from the Linux Foundation, so who’s this good for? You search for Linux, you get Microsoft (articles like this one or this one.) This is what Microsoft wants us to see in search results for “Linux”: Azure, WSL and so on.

https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/windows-linux-kernel/
https://www.how2shout.com/how-to/how-to-install-apache-mysql-php-phpmyadmin-on-windows-10-wsl.html

“Linux.com essentially shut down
back in April, leaving some people

http://linuxgizmos.com/nxp-unveils-cortex-a35-based-i-mx8-variant-for-azure-sphere/
https://www.iottechtrends.com/aws-iot-services-iot-project/

“Can we support Linux if it’s led and controlled by companies that use it to spread DRM?”We recently began wondering if Linux still holds the same promises of freedom the GNU project initially put forth. “I’d say yes for now,” one reader argued. “And especially support Linus himself. If he moves, follow.”

And when asked “what about other
OSes?” (as in supporting Hurd, Guix

https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/about/

This reader went on to expressing his concerns about IBM. “I really don’t know what to do about the IBM/RHT thing,” I confessed. “Or rather, not sure… that too needs to be clearly defined and time will tell (depending on what IBM does)…”

“Proprietary stuff gets built
around “Linux” and then

IBM won’t profit from “Linux”; it
will profit from stuff like RHEL

“Torvalds is wealthy enough to run
the kernel on his own, even without

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink  Send this to a friend

mailto://blank


----------
➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.
you're on gemini.techrights.org/2019/07/13/linux-control-over-users/